Hate Pastor James Manning Melts Down At Protesters: “You Sick Faggots And Lesbos Will Burn!” [VIDEO]

Hate Pastor James David Manning had a screaming, ranting meltdown on Tuesday night as Harlem Against Homophobia staged a protest outside his church. As activists chanted “Stop the hate now!” Manning climbed up on a chair to unleash some of his famous Christian Love. “There is no salvation for butt-lickers and butt-bangers like you! You perverted faggots! You smell like rectums! I am the greatest preacher and defender of the word of God! Hallelujah!” All of this he proudly posted to his YouTube channel, which somehow has not been banned for hate speech. Manning’s church is listed a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

  • 2karmanot

    From Gawd’s turd to Pastor Manning’s toilet brain.

  • radiofreerome

    Narcissist or sociopath?

    • Mr. Spiffy

      A little from column A….

    • Bob Conti

      Yes.

    • joe ho

      just a christian who takes his foundational texts seriously.

    • RobynWatts

      Attention Whore.

    • Stev84

      Those often go hand in hand

      • radiofreerome

        I used to report to the CTO of a biotech company. I spent most of my lunches discussing whether the boss was a narcissist or a sociopath.

    • CottonBlimp

      Honestly, I got money on schizophrenic.

  • pickypecker
    • anne marie in philly

      could not have said it better myself!

    • JT

      Here’s another idea: put this psychopath under psychiatric observation right away.

  • Herald

    Just down-voted and reported for hate speech

  • oikos

    More protests are needed then. They struck a nerve. Push him right over the edge.

    • Todd20036

      I think he’s past that stage.

    • Jean-Marc in Canada

      …or off the roof, either one works for me 🙂

    • Goodboy

      I’m not sure giving this attention seeking duchebag more attention is a good thing though. You can’t shame the shameless. He sounds more like a pig in slop happy with it. Talk about his fake degree, fake ideology, his many lies, and his felon past would work better IMO.

      Start filming the ones that are attending his church too. Put it on Youtube and they’ll scatter like cockroaches.

    • b

      The best was when they started calling him “JAILBIRD!!!” and he really became nuts.

      • oikos

        Nutters like him hate the truth.

    • Paula

      Yes, he could have the big one right there and fall dead on the steps.

    • JT

      He knows he liked the sex when he was in prison and that’s what fuels his craziness.

  • Tawdry D’Tails

    He seems nice…
    Has this True Christian endorsed Trump yet?

    • More to the point, has trump endorsed him?

  • SoCalVet

    I’m really surprised that nobody has vandalized that sign. I don’t think I could stop myself if I lived near there.

    • Todd20036

      Why bother? That sign is so offensive, it does far more for our causes than anything we could have put up in its place.

  • Justin

    I’m beginning to get the impression he doesn’t like us. Makes me sad.

    • Todd20036

      Really? I get the impression that he is one of us, and REALLY hates himself for it, which truly is sad.

      • AtticusP

        I sure hope you’re wrong.

        Aside from both of us breathing oxygen, I hope that I have absolutely nothing else in common with this person.

      • Justin

        Being one of us? Ewww. That would be sad. Don’t. Want. Him. Ewww. Double ewww.

        • RobynWatts

          I don’t think think there is any danger of that. He burned any Gay Card that was issued to him and the main office said “Fuck no!” about any replacements.

      • Snarkaholic

        Yes. One finger pointing at the crowd…and Three fingers pointing back at himself.

    • Todd E.

      He seems nice.

      • JeffreyMGr

        I was thinking the same thing. I might invite him out to coffee, care to join us?

        • Bad Tom

          Be sure it’s Starbucks!

          • JCF

            A round of Semen Lattes for all!

  • Joe in PA

    someones been thinking about the butt sects too much.

    • Joseph Miceli

      That seem to be all any of them think about. I notice that Jesus never got around to mentioning the ass sex.

  • Billanddogs

    I fear the long focus on the black man at the beginning was intended as incitement to violence toward him by any church members who might recognize him. I hope not.

  • joe ho

    at least he’s being true to christianity’s foundational texts, unlike the lgbt christian apologists who want to rewrite christian history and theology.

    • Jean-Marc in Canada

      Sadly, there’s a great deal of truth in that statement.

    • Octavio

      “But he really does love us, joe hoe, he really, really does. It’s all the butt sechs and pee pee sucking that Manning hates. It’s nuthin’ personal. Really. Praize Jeebuzz!”

      • joe ho

        it’s stockholm syndrome.

        the abrahamic religions just aren’t into the gays.

        • RoFaWh

          A bit of context, Joe: the ancient Romans, often held up for inspection as models of depravity, were fairly prudish in their own way. It was considered scandalous for a couple (var. het) to have sex in a well lit room. Profound darkness was the thing.

          One exception: couples were allowed to enjoy the sight of each other nekkid on their wedding day.

          • joe ho

            lol.

            i’m afraid you’re an example of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing.

            you’ve been misled by certain claims later romans made about their own stern ancestors, pretending the early republican past was less licentious and corrupt than the present. it was the same thing as today’s people longing for the leave it to beaver days of the past which were supposedly idyllic.

            as hellenism spread throughout republican and then imperial rome sexual libertarianism was the rule, not the exception. roman men were permitted to penetrate anyone in sight. being penetrated was not ok, especially if you were freeborn and older than your early 20s.

            there’s a vast archive of historic, literary, juridical, and artistic evidence to show that your claim of roman prudery is wrong.

            sorry.

    • Sounds like a TrueChristian(TM) to me. Pure, raw hatred. Except, back in the day when I had to attend those rural southern baptist and pentecostal churches, they preached white superiority. They wouldn’t have liked Mr. Manning much. And catholics were idolaters in satan’s Whore of Babylon church. And women kept their heads covered and their mouths shut. And qweers, and all around hate for everybody and everything. And the End Times bullshit.

      Being 14 my first time in church and hearing this spew of garbage, surrounded by crazy people, it’s no fucking wonder i became an instant life-long atheist.

    • Chris Larosa

      It’s not about rewriting Christian history. It’s about a correct understanding of the original text in its proper context. For example, believing the earth is not 6800 years old is not rewriting anything – it’s the clear understanding that the writer of Gen wrote the creation account in terms of hyperbole and poetry for a primitive people. Science proves this, just as rational people accept people are born LGBT and not due to some magical transformation from straight-to-gay because of individual pagan idolatry – a complete misunderstanding and hostile misuse of Romans 1. Pas-turd Manning is hardly being true to anything Christian – he betrays everything Christ taught about regards to loving your neighbor, the Golden Rule, humility and meekness. He’s as much of an ass as the rectums he’s obsessed over.

      • joe ho

        lol. that’s rewriting the history of christianity, which was founded as an ascetic cult based on sexual purity. homosexual sex was not included, no matter how you lgbt christian apologists want it to be.

        as far as a “correct” understanding, the anti-gay understanding has as much validity as does the pro-gay one. that’s the trouble with using religious supernatural nonsense as opposed to empirical evidence to adjucate issues like homosexuality.

        the love your neighbor jesus is counterbalanced by the you’re going to hell jesus. jesus threatens people with hell more often than any other figure in the bible. portraying him as the endless fountain of love is nonsense.

        and as far a what constitutes love, the anti-gay christians will insist that they are indeed loving you by rejecting your homosexual sex, just as jesus is showing “love” by chastising and having you turn away from sin. who are you to say that they are not practicing the golden rule by trying to turn you away from your sexual immorality/porneia?

        and the anti-gays have much more historical and scriptural support on their side.

        you guys are trying to put lipstick on a christian pig.

        the abrahamic religions are just not that much into gays, unless you want to live a life of chastity. only the most outrageous revisionists are pretending it’s otherwise.

        it’s better, and easier just to walk away from all that unsubstantiated archaic bigoted nonsense altogether.

        gays who cling to a tradition that essentially rejects them are pitiful.

        • Chris Larosa

          Obviously you’ve had a pretty shitty experience and I touched a nerve. And although I can definitely see your perspective, you choose to look at overall Christianity through a jaded lens. I don’t. You’re absolutely right – there are those that see Christ as wrathful and bigoted – I spent 27 years with those of that ilk and I fled when I came out. But there are those that see a different form – and the majority of them are STRAIGHT, not LGBT. And there’s a lot of them – they just don’t get the airtime a-holes like Huckster and Perkins get. Obviously, we’ve both had extensive experience with this theology. You’ve discounted it and that’s your right. I’ve rejected shitty ‘tradition’ but continue to believe in the goodness of God and the overall message of agape love. However, to insult me and other gay Christians on this site and call us pitiful is insulting. Last time I checked we were on your side. Sad how gay Christians get shit on by the nutwings and in turn get shit on by some atheists. The gift that keeps on giving I guess..

          • joe ho

            my point is that it’s all nonsense and unnecessary.

            but for you to claim that your pro-gay version is “true” christianity and theirs is wrong is simply unsupportable. you’re both making claims about reality for which you have no credible evidence. that’s why it’s a fool’s game.

            and the anti-gay version is justified both by the sexual attitudes of the jews and christians of the early christian period (who supposedly would have been closest to jesus) and by christianity’s own historical understanding of itself.

            you don’t need to believe in the supernatural to learn to be nice to people or to feel connected to others and find awe and wonder in the natural universe.

            the irony is that when you demand validation for your supernatural views (for which you have no credible evidence) you also are demanding validation for theirs.

            instead, just get rid of those foolish cult beliefs altogether. is homosexuality harmful to human functioning and society? that’s something we can answer empirically. no need for divine revelation.

            but if you’re going to say divine revelation is real and ok, then you’re going to have a hard time saying the anti-gay divine revelation that homoseuxality is bad is wrong.

          • Glen

            Very well stated Joe.

            The liberal progressive sects of religion lend credibility and justification to the conservative regressive sects and all the evil perpetrated in the name of religion throughout history.

          • Chris Larosa

            I understand your point. But up front, no, I don’t believe you have to believe in the supernatural in order to be nice and feel connected to people, and no, I’m not demanding any validation of anything – other than representing a voice that disagrees with fundamentalists and that not all Christians are rabid anti-gay nuts. Remember you’re the one requesting me to abandon my beliefs yet I have not suggested anything of the like for you. But you’re right – as long as there are 5 ancient texts that address some homosexual behavior in a very negative light, and as long as there are those that read this stuff at complete face value, I will most certainly have a hard time convincing those devotees that their perspective is wrong. I don’t need to convince you since we are of the same opinion, obviously, but my plea is to those literalists – and I’ve made headway. The power of the ‘transformative relationship’ forces those to reevaluate their anti-gay theology. Read the news. It happens almost everyday. And I’m glad for that.

          • joe ho

            you do understand that there is no evidence whatsoever that a historical preacher/rabbi active in the first century such as jesus would have accepted homosexual sexual acts as conforming to the sexual purity codes of the judaic or early christian traditions?

            the early christians were so ascetic that heterosexual sex was treated suspiciously.

            the notion of a historical jesus openly welcoming homosexual couples and blessing their sexual unions is an absurd fantasy of modern lgbts.

          • Chris Larosa

            Yep. Got it. In the meantime, my cohorts and I shall revel in our absurd fantasy! 😀

          • joe ho

            and a fantasy it is, making gods in your own image!

          • Chris Larosa

            Then my God must be SUPER hot! 😉
            Btw, I’m a little hurt you didn’t like my avatar. Sniff.

      • Glen

        Even in hyperbole and poetry the Genesis account makes absolutely no logical sense in relation to reality.

        • Chris Larosa

          Well, lol, I fully agree. That’s why I stopped drinking that koolaid 15 years ago. THose who believe that literal account are applying what I call ‘stubborn faith’ and the honest ones know that Gen 1 is just nuts…but believe if they abandon that perspective, God will abandon them and they’ll be labelled a heretic. If you’re a literalist Christian, well then, of course you don’t want to be labelled a heretic. I stopped believing the Gen account as literal when, as a person who has spent considerable time in the space sciences community, could no longer coexist with intense cognitive dissonance. Some will never get to that place, particularly the uneducated.

      • Glen

        To learn more about the Christian ‘god’ please grab a Bible and head on over to http://www.EvilBible.com

        As well as http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/

        • Chris Larosa

          Glen. I’ve read plenty. I get your point.

      • shivadog

        To try to pretend that the Bible isn’t hostile towards homosexuality seems pretty much delusional to me. You can ignore those parts like people ignore much of the other awful stuff in the Bible but don’t try to pretend it doesn’t say really terrible stuff about homosexuality.

        • Chris Larosa

          Oh geez did I open a can of worms here? Delusional? Then I’m in really good company as there are a lot of us who don’t see the bible as anti-gay. Yes, I agree there is a lot of awful stuff in the bible, particularly in Deuteronomy and Genesis, but I would appeal it also reveals some of the sickness of ancient cultures, ie Molech and child sacrifice. But all of the ‘terrible stuff’ about homosexuality? It’s not there. I’m sorry, but 5 references to homosexual behavior, in light of rampant superstition in the ancient world coupled with all of the other terrible stuff like stoning your sassy children and killing non-virgins…is it really delusional to rethink what the supposed 2 biblical authors of these references meant in their context? Romans 1 is a perfect example of a dubious interpretation. And remember there are far more terrible references to ‘heterosexuality’ if you think about it.

          • shivadog

            So all that stuff about abominations and putting gay men to death aren’t in the Bible? It seems strange to me that even though it is supposed to be the word of God, you can pick and choose which parts you listen to and which parts you ignore. Why not just admit the whole thing is rubbish and you are forming your morality from a more enlightened perspective?

          • Chris Larosa

            Well prepare for more strangeness. 😉 You pose a good question, but just because there appears to be some crazy shit in the Bible doesn’t tell me to put all of it through the shredder. But I absolutely respect those who have come to that conclusion. Even my oldest son is ready to do that after being a fundamentalist his entire life. And you’re right about Leviticus (and there is one requiring men caught banging each other to be killed), but a husband and wife being caught having sex during the menstruation cycle are essentially to be killed as well. So I am compelled to look at these scriptures with scrutiny and seek a deeper contextual meaning. There are many many books that address this as well and both protestant and catholic pastors are “converting’ by the day to this perspective. And there is plenty of evidence that the 3 passages in the NT are misunderstood and more-so poorly mistranslated (Paul says ALL ‘gay’ people hate God and worship statues…?) Either way you are absolutely correct about picking and choosing scripture – but all Xians do that – every single one – because some SHOULD be discounted due to invalid context, different covenants, and irrelevant cultural practices. Instead of embracing a literal ‘sola scriptura’ perspective or a ‘rubish’ perpsective, I choose to apply reason and experience (Episcopal model) to my faith and it works well for me. I’m sure that invites ridicule, as you can see, but I can’t worry about that. C’est le vie.

          • shivadog

            I don’t mean to ridicule you. It just concerns me that when people pick and choose which parts of the Bible to follow and which to discard, it is essentially trying to give your own opinion the backing of God. Which in your case might be alright because you choose the loving parts and reject the hateful parts, but it is equally valid for people who choose the hateful parts.

          • Chris Larosa

            You’re right. And that’s always going to be a huge point of contention within the different denominations. I guess it’s something all Christians have to live with. Where I have made a significant change in my life is where I have finally evolved to the place I wasn’t for almost 30 years: I could be wrong. About all of it. And I’m ok with that. I wish more Christians were willing to get to that point. Coming out was the best thing that ever happened to me.

          • David Anthony Neal

            Reality check. The ancients had no knowledge of homosexuality (that word was not even coined until the 19th century) or the prevalence of same sex attraction. We don’t use the Bible as a text for treating illnesses (demon possession anyone?) or proving once and for all that the sun orbits the earth. To use the Bible in the 21st century as a guide or treatise on human sexuality is nonsense. But some do. Also, there are many abominations mentioned in the Bible and some of them included such minor offenses as eating shell fish and wearing fabric woven of two materials. Our meaning of “abomination” differs from the word that the authors of the Bible used which has been translated as “abomination”.

          • joe ho

            the ancient greeks and romans knew plenty about same sex attraction, though not as much as we know today. same-sex desires are well documented in their art and literature. many forms of same-sex sex were integrated into their culture.

            the ancient greek and roman intuitions about human sexuality and its diversity were much closer to reality than were the ideas of ancient hebrew culture, which unfortunately were the ones that got embedded, through force, into western civilization after constantine.

            if jesus was god and the bible is the inspired word of god and the bible condemns same-sex acts, isn’t there something wrong with the picture you’re painting? someone is not telling the truth.

          • shivadog

            So you admit the Bible is full of shit on these subjects, why should we use it as a guide for anything? It was wrong on that stuff, just like it is wrong when it supports slavery, genocide and the subjugation of women. What you have said only strengthens my point that we should discard the whole ridiculous book of fables.

  • Sk3ptic

    I’m pretty sure this works the same with the Good Pastor.

  • Michael Rush

    He’s been drinking the same blood of Jesus as Kim Davis .

  • vorpal

    Someone give the poor man a hot beverage to help him calm down before he has an aneurism.
    I recommend a nice Starbucks latte.

    • Todd20036

      You sir, are evil. Come sit by me.

    • With extra semeny goodness.

    • Joseph Miceli

      I hear that goes well with Doritos!

  • AtticusP

    His Lord and Savior Jesus Christ must be so proud of him…

    • joe ho

      why? jesus threatens people with hell more often than any other figure in the bible. christians are called to model themselves on christ.

      • AtticusP

        Funny, I read the Bible for years.

        And that wasn’t my take on Christ at all.

        Different strains of Christianity perhaps….

  • Macbill

    How righteous of him.

  • MikeBx2

    Another one who’s clearly thought a lot about what he imagines gay men do in private. Probably did some online research as well.

    • 2guysnamedjoe

      He’s done a lot of field research, too.

    • Necessitas

      He’s burning in lust, that much is obvious.

  • Lakeviewbob

    I cannot hate the mentally ill. So so sad.

    I hope there is a lot more of this to come.

    • Tor

      Per Joann Prinzivalli, it is a “religious disability.”

      • Six Pins Delores

        That had better not entitle them to handicapped parking!

  • MarkOH

    “You smell like rectums!”
    Takes one to know one, bub

  • And that concludes today’s sermon about the perverted but-banging faggots. And now brothers and sisters, let us turn in our hymnals to hymn 205, They Will Know We Are Christians By Our Love.

    ♫We are one in the Spirit
    We are one in the Lord
    We are one in the Spirit
    We are one in the Lord
    And we pray that all unity may one day be restored

    And they’ll know we are Christians by our love, by our love
    Yes, they’ll know we are Christians by our love ♬

    ♫We will work with each other
    We will work side by side
    We will work with each other
    We will work side by side
    And we’ll guard each man’s dignity and save each man’s pride

    And they’ll know we are Christians by our love, by our love
    Yes, they’ll know we are Christians by our love, our love ♬

    ♫We will walk with each other
    We will walk hand in hand
    We will walk with each other
    We will walk hand in hand
    And together we’ll spread the news that God is in our land

    And they’ll know we are Christians by our love, by our love
    Yes they’ll know we are Christians by our love ♬

  • MattM

    How did he find out we lick butts? And why is he so familiar with the smell of rectums?
    Also, what do the other grift…..I mean “preachers” think when calls himself “the greatest preacher”?

    • Lakeviewbob

      I remember 30 some years ago working with a man who was ex military who had had R&R in Thailand. He recounted a time when a prostitute had licked his ass and how much he liked it. All of the men standing around were nodding and imagining how good it felt. Why is rimming so only associated with gay men?

      • Bad Tom

        Projection.

    • AtticusP

      Colossal asshole that he is, how could he NOT be familiar with the smell of rectums?

  • KentDean

    Well, gosh … several words come to mind as I read this … Seroquel … Risperdal … Clozaril …

  • I always wonder if it would be better just to ignore these imbeciles.

  • Yalma Cuder-Zicci

    The butt-lickers and butt-bangers really got under his skin.

    • Ragnar Lothbrok

      And up his butt,where he wants it.

  • Suzy

    “I am the greatest preacher and defender of the word of God!”

    So those humility lessons definitely took…

  • Ragnar Lothbrok

    Butt Bangers !!! LOL ha ha ha ha ha

  • Luther Kreiger

    Completely fucking bonkers. You can’t even try to apply the veneer of socially-acceptable “religiosity” over this man’s insanity that excuses the usual bizarre magical thinking and hatred. Foaming, inarticulate and ugly rage is all that fuels this excuse for a human being and it’s out there for everyone to see.

    Kudos to the protesters, it needs to become a regular thing

  • RobynWatts

    Wow. I can just feel that Christian Love ™ bellowing out of his blowhole….both of them too!

    Uh, Manning, you might want to get that suit checked out. Odds are that it’s made from the finest fabrics blended together, and that’s a big no-no in that little black book you love so much. Also, check out “gluttony”, “bearing false witness”, and a couple of others that you have obviously skipped over, you hypocrite.

    • William

      I bet he got the suit off the guest of honor at a funeral.

      • RobynWatts

        Poor guy…..a dead man had to be touch by this nutcase. Can’t the dead rest in peace?!!

  • Ragnar Lothbrok

    About time the decent people in the hood came out to shame that crazy stain.

    • ColdCountry

      I doubt he can be shamed.

  • disqus_oCvsL5SBJH

    Do NOT read the YouTube comments. Hate-speech-a-palooza. This is still what we’re up against. Would these kind of people be able to prop up this hatred without religion? I don’t know, but it seems much harder to understand how one could be so removed from the progress in human thought without religion to retard it.

    • Steve Teeter

      I forget who said it, but: “Good men will do good things, and bad men will do bad things. But for good men to do bad things you need religion.”

  • Keep up the pressure guys, he’s gonna do something REALLY stupid soon.

  • Remember, it’s not hate speech if you use your invisible friend as justification.

  • grada3784

    Situation normal, all fucked up.

  • Sean

    Nope.

  • Henri205

    He seems nice. But as to whether I care……

    • Joseph Miceli

      Very nice!!!!

  • BobSF_94117

    Shouldn’t that be “recta”?

    • RoFaWh

      Only if you are an elitist snob.

      If you are speaking ordinary English, “rectums” is the right way to say it.

      Just like “octopus”, of which the English language plural is “octopuses”.

      Incidentally the elitist snobs say “octopodes” and leave “octopi” for the intellecutally unwashed. Why? Because the -pus in octopus is the Greek word for foot, not the ordinary Latin second declension ending.

      • BobSF_94117

        Then recta it is!

  • Natty Enquirer

    What a waste of time. Decent people need no convincing that Manning is a vile idiot. And his followers are beyond hope.

  • Ninja0980

    Someone get the net already!

  • Cosmo Tupper

    Whatever you say….whatever you say…I’m going to hell. With climate change, it will be like a/c – cool, calm and collected.

  • Stev84

    Eat da poo poo!

  • Christopher

    Dude!

    You need therapy. Let me help.

  • MDB
  • Judy

    Shorter version: Jaysusss is gonna git yew!

  • Robert W. Pierce

    How would he know what a rectum smells like? 😉

    • Giant Monster Gamera

      That’s where his head is.

  • secretlab

    It’s really time for YouTube to enforce its own TOS, and ban ATLAH’s channel. On the bright side, Manning gives ample evidence that Xtian extremists need a padded room, not ‘special accommodations’.

    • Lane

      I kinda like seeing it because it exposes it for what it is. Banning this over-the-top stuff keeps it hidden.

  • 2patricius2

    Why did the protestors upset him so much? Why is he focused on the butt? Hmm?

  • Map

    I see a caption below the photo of him pointing his finger….
    ” In the name of JE-sus pull my finger !

  • ColdCountry

    He reminds me of the Alcalde in “Zorro, the Gay Blade” screaming about how important he is.

  • dcurlee

    They obviously struck a nerve

  • Jan Wesselius

    Manning sounds just a bit of egotistical.

    • zhera

      “I AM THE CHAMPION! I AM THE GREATEST PREACHER IN THE WORLD!

      (my dick is tiny)”

  • Glen

    Way to represent Pastor.

    Show religion for what it is.

    Preach!

  • GayOldLady

    “faggots” & “lesbos”? Wow, we’ve never been called that before.

    • LonelyLiberal

      I prefer “butt pirate” or “rear ranger” while my lesbian cousin refers to herself as a “carpet cleaner.”

      • I’m quite partial to “Sausage Jockey” and of course Joe’s term of endearment for his older generation of faithful “Elder Gay”

    • Wynter Marie Starr

      I’ve been called that as well. Usually when I’ve refused some asshole’s clumsy come on. Men that identify as straight think the worst thing they can call a woman is a dyke, a lesbo, or a bitch, and the worst thing you can call a man is a faggot. It’s telling, isn’t it?

      My personal favorite has been the devil’s hand maiden. I think I’m gonna get it put on a tee shirt.

  • EqualityForAll

    I wonder what’s making him so angry. Could it be that he’s losing his congregation due to his own lunacy? I think so – and the butt-lickers must be the reason for that. Right?

  • Rex

    Let me interpret – “Blah, blah, blah, I hate gays, blah, blah, blah,…”

  • Taylor

    “You smell like rectums!”

    One would have to assume the only reason he knows what rectums smell like, is because he’s sniffed one or two himself.

    The lady doth protest too much, methinks!

    • Sniffed one or two? His nickname in prison was Rimseat.

  • LonelyLiberal

    Actually, I smell of home-made cherry soap and my clothes have a whiff of home-made laundry soap as well. Other than that, I’m rectum-free unless I ate Taco Bell or some such crap and have terrible gas.

    • grada3784

      Actually, he was talking to me. I have terrible gas – goes with my age. But I haven’t had sex in years.

  • Lane

    Shhh, shhh…. Tell me, who hurt you? Someone clearly hurt you to make you feel the need to lash out like this.

  • Lane

    Also, at 5:38, he says “I have, and will continue, to kiss your butts.” [emphasis added]
    Slip of the tongue? Totally makes sense, though.

  • Lane

    And I _totally_ expected to see a bolt of lightning strike him down at the end when he proclaims himself the greatest preacher and defender of the word of god.

  • Richard Rush

    Christian Love™ means never having to say your sorry ass is hateful.

  • grada3784

    Manning acts like a prison rape victim. I wonder.

  • zhera

    Couldn’t protesting this sick man be considered ‘feeding the ‘troll’?

    He loved every second if it. He couldn’t even stop himself from smiling as he came up with all the derogatory words he knows.

    It all reminded me of that Breitbart video where he shouts ‘Stop raping people!’ Insanity all over them both.

    • Natty Enquirer

      It sure is. All they accomplished is helping him make a new YouTube video. It’s not like they changed anyone’s mind about this guy.

  • *TeaCup*

    OMG such language, how can you possibly be a man of God & use such foul/hurtful words?? You’re the one that’s going to burn you fvcking hypocrite!! God is about LOVE & not HATE!! Love your fellow man, regardless of if you agree with them, not blast them with such homophobic B.S.!! I’m sure this sorry P.O.S. is dipping in the church intake from members to fund his extra-martial affairs, God is watching & he’s not pleased!!

    • noni

      This is the face of Christianity.

      Many continue to deny this fact.

  • Clive Johnson

    What’s needed is a projector that can cast 5-10 foot images on the wall of the church from across the street–images of men kissing each other and women kissing each other.

  • noni

    Manning taking up the cause for ‘eat da poo poo’.

  • noni

    Manning is the one who created this video. He is milking this for all it’s worth. To him it’s money maker, gets people to view his videos, and continue watching his vaudeville show.

    • Pretty soon he’ll be doing his videos in blackface.

  • Bj Lincoln

    I keep flagging his videos and channel but to no avail.

  • Edmund Allin
  • Clive Johnson

    Aren’t we overdue for retiring this kind of religious faith into permanent oblivion?

  • GanymedeRenard

    “I am the greatest preacher and defender of the word of God!”

    Wasn’t pride the reason why gawd cast Lucifer out of heaven in the first place? Are you implying you’re a follower of Satan, Mr. Manning? This would mean YOU’re the one who’s gonna burn. I hope you enjoy it! – provided Hell exists, of course.

  • Raising_Rlyeh

    He seems to have an inflated sense of worth if he truly believes that he is the greatest preacher.

  • prjoe

    Butt-lickers ? Not that there’s anything wrong with that!

  • JBBelgium

    This pastor needs his medication on time without exceptions

  • John

    F*** that n*****.

  • John

    Tell him to get to the back of the bus. That will shut him up very quickly.

  • Clint Batterton

    Well, as the social scientists keep telling us, the foam-at-the-mouth homophobes are usually self-hating gay men who can’t deal with their own emotions. If you want to kill all homosexuals, you might start with yourself.

  • JVB

    Here ya go.

  • Joseph Miceli

    You faggots are all gonna burn….in the disco inferno!!! Fuck these hate filled sacks of shit. We won! Dance Bitches!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7EfnYwpmOE

    • They need to set up a disco outside his sin factory.

  • ColdDesert

    What’s with the mafia goons?

  • JCF

    Ted Cruz and Ben Carson still wants his endorsement…

  • I think it’s official, he’s a performance artist. That’s some funny shit.

  • Steven Leahy

    I wonder if he ever gets laryngitis?

    • No, but he gets a sore throat in the bathroom.

  • marti386

    Yeah, keep selling that Jebus love, Pastor Manning. It’s totally working.

  • Rachel Abel McDonald

    Tax his “church “

  • i’m currently in wales visiting my family. i showed this clip to my parents and the first thing my dad said was “no actually-straight man is that obsessed with people who are gay. what happened to him in life?”

    exactly

  • NMNative

    Can’t you just feel the love?

  • William Smith

    I have a name for him…but my values will not allow me to spew it at him…sad man

  • Phil B.

    Can’t bring myself to watch this guy, but I hope the protesters laughed in his face.

  • Helookalikaman79

    He sure does know A LOT about homosexual sex…. It would be funny, if he was a closeted GLBTQA, and was screaming because the dildo went to deep… The ones that scream the loudest usually are screaming about themselves

  • Brandon Haist

    Lets think about this logically. God preaches Love and Acceptance and Treating others how you wish to be treated. The Devil preaches Hate and Intolerance and loves to corrupt people. The bible is FILLED with hatred and thus the people who act like this man does are a byproduct of that. What if, and this is a huge what if, the bible was written by Satan. Think about it, it could be truth. The greatest lie ever told. If the Devil or Lucifer wanted to get back at God for banishing him wouldn’t this be the best way of doing it? Write a book that is supposedly about his laws and virtues but is twisted in a way that creates hatred and evil. Thus corrupting people and sending them to hell. I don’t follow any religion because I feel that they are all evil because they force conformation through threats of going to hell. Compliance through fear is evil in my eyes and it breeds disgusting types of people (not all the time but a lot of the time) (i.e. people like this guy). Lucifer or Satan or the Devil is called the great deceiver because he is supposedly able to manipulate people through lies and deceit, why would this be out of the realm of possibility? Just some food for thought from an outside perspective.

    • franklinb23

      “But what was the instrument of the devil’s slandering of God? What means did he use in order to convince humanity, in order to pervert human thought?

      He used “theology”. He first introduced a slight alteration in theology which, once it was accepted, he managed to increase more and more to the degree that Christianity became completely unrecognizable. This is what we call “Western theology”.”

      This from an Greek Orthodox priest:

      http://blogs.ancientfaith.com/glory2godforallthings/the-river-of-fire-kalomiros/