STAT News reports:
Last week, at least one scientific journal received a letter from a top U.S. attorney asking it to respond to alleged bias. Now, one of the world’s leading medical journals, has received a similar inquiry as well.
The New England Journal of Medicine’s editor in chief, Eric Rubin, received a letter from the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Edward R. Martin Jr. in recent days in which the prosecutor asked six questions, largely about alleged bias in the decision to publish unspecified content.
The journal told STAT it responded by affirming its commitment to evidence-based recommendations and editorial independence.
The New York Times reports:
At least three other journals have received similar letters from Edward Martin Jr., a Republican activist serving as interim U.S. attorney in Washington. Mr. Martin has been criticized for using his office to target opponents of the administration.
His letters accused the publications of being “partisans in various scientific debates” and asked a series of accusatory questions about bias and the selection of research articles.
Do they accept submissions from scientists with “competing viewpoints”? What do they do if the authors whose work they published “may have misled their readers”? Are they transparent about influence from “supporters, funders, advertisers and others”?
The DOJ is now targeting @NEJM, requesting information on alleged bias. It is one of the most respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world. @KristinaMFiore https://t.co/oVQw4PvTX8
— Dr. Brian H. Williams (@BHWilliamsMD) April 25, 2025
Trump’s acting chief prosecutor for DC interrogates medical journals about their publishing policies and whether they accept dissent, implying that he may deem it a crime to prosecute if he doesn’t like their answers. @teddyrosenbluth @RebeccaDRobbins https://t.co/7IZXOeRb0b
— Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) April 19, 2025