CNN reports:
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said the White House and federal agencies such as the FBI may continue to urge social media platforms to take down content the government views as misinformation, handing the Biden administration a technical if important election-year victory.
Of immediate significance, the decision means that the Department of Homeland Security may continue to flag posts to social media companies such as Facebook and X that it believes may be the work of foreign agents seeking to disrupt this year’s presidential race.
The Washington Post reports:
State leaders in Missouri and Louisiana, in addition to individual social media users, filed a lawsuit accusing the Biden administration of violating the First Amendment by operating a sprawling federal “censorship enterprise” to improperly influence platforms to modify or take down posts related to public health and elections.
In a 6-3 ruling, the majority said the challengers did not have legal grounds — or standing — to bring the case against the Biden administration.
The case, known as Murthy v. Missouri, gave the Supreme Court an opportunity to shape how government officials interact with social media companies and communicate with the public online.
The cult is raging. Photo: Missouri AG Andrew Bailey. The Court issued no rulings today on any of the other pending major cases.
The Supreme Court’s first decision of the day is Murthy v. Missouri, the social media “jawboning” case. By a 6–3 vote, the court holds that the plaintiffs lack standing.
Big win for the Biden administration. Another loss for the 5th Circuit. https://t.co/KWKaJVzhLb pic.twitter.com/hXgRKduOMK
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) June 26, 2024
Breaking! The Supreme Court rules that the plaintiffs in Murthy v. Missouri do not have standing to sue.
This is a huge loss for Free Speech in America. pic.twitter.com/VRBJzl8ijy
— Media Research Center (@theMRC) June 26, 2024