From the ACLU:
The Moore v Harper case hinges on a legal proposition known as the “independent state legislature theory.” The theory asserts that, when it comes to making state laws that apply to federal elections — from drawing congressional district lines, to determining the who-what-when-where of casting a ballot — only the state legislature itself has the power to set the rules.
The theory claims that the state legislatures’ power is so exclusive that they can ignore the requirements of their own state constitution, including the fair districting requirements that the North Carolina Supreme Court has enforced under its own state constitutional power of judicial review. That is not how our system works.
Legislatures cannot ignore the constitutions to which they owe their very existence. They cannot act outside the law, without any checks and balances. Yet that is what the North Carolina legislators are asking the Supreme Court to give them — the power to set rules for voting and elections without state constitutional limits enforced by state courts.
And here’s the ruling.
Third (and *last*) ruling is Moore v. Harper.
For a 6-3 majority (Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissenting), Chief Justice Roberts reaches the merits and *rejects* the “independent state legislature” theory:https://t.co/EfbSKSwBm7
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) June 27, 2023
🚨BREAKING: Supreme Court REJECTS radical Independent State Legislature theory. AFFIRMS North Carolina redistricting victory. Congrats to @DemRedistrict and @EliasLawGroup team on amazing victory. https://t.co/il4XmWuWY1
— Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) June 27, 2023
We just got Moore v. Harper.
I need to read the full opinion, but it looks like SCOTUS did not decide to appoint Donald Trump president-for-life.https://t.co/DB2YwflX4u
— Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) June 27, 2023