The New York Times reports:
A federal judge signaled on Thursday that she remained open to granting former President Donald J. Trump’s request to appoint an independent arbiter to go through documents the F.B.I. seized from him last month, but stopped short of making a final decision.
After a nearly two-hour hearing, the judge, Aileen M. Cannon of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida, reserved judgment on the question of whether to appoint a so-called special master in the case, saying she would issue a written order “in due course.”
Notably, Judge Cannon did not direct the F.B.I. to stop working with the files, which the Justice Department has said have already undergone a preliminary review by law enforcement officials.
NBC News reports:
The Justice Department was ready for the possibility the judge would order that the more detailed list be unsealed, saying in a court filing earlier this week, “the government is prepared, given the extraordinary circumstances, to unseal the more detailed receipt and provide it immediately to Plaintiff.”
It’s unclear when the document will be released. While the government characterized the case in grave terms related to national security and classified documents, Trump lawyer Jim Trusty compared it to something more mundane.
“We’ve characterized it at times as an overdue-library-book scenario where there’s a dispute — not even a dispute — but ongoing negotiations with [the National Archives] that has suddenly been transformed into a criminal investigation,” he said
A federal judge signaled that she remained open to Donald Trump’s request to appoint a special master to review documents seized from Mar-a-Lago, but she stopped short of making a final decision. https://t.co/SFniQqMfmI
— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 1, 2022