The Washington Post reports:
In the final days of the 2018 election, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) loaned his campaign $260,000, specifically so he could challenge an obscure campaign finance restriction that only $250,000 in personal loans can be repaid with money raised after an election. Oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Wednesday indicated Cruz is in position to collect on his investment.
But Cruz’s lawyer, Charles J. Cooper, said the senator was following in the footsteps of civil rights activists who have violated laws to prove in court they were unconstitutional. Cooper’s most relentless interrogator was Justice Elena Kagan. What “jumps off the page,” she said, is the potential for contributors to “find a way to put money not in the campaign but into a candidate’s own personal pocket.”
Read the full article.
Charlies Cooper appeared on JMG in 2017 when he was hired by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to represent him during testimony in the Mueller investigation.
Cooper defended Proposition 8 before the US Supreme Court on behalf of California’s viciously anti-gay Protect Marriage, but made a u-turn in 2014, declaring that his own daughter’s marriage to a woman had changed his mind on the issue.
The Supreme Court seemed ready on Wednesday to side with a challenge to a federal campaign finance law brought by Sen. Ted Cruz. It would be the latest in a series of decisions dismantling parts of campaign finance regulations on First Amendment grounds. https://t.co/xccViNTvrS
— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 19, 2022
Ted Cruz has spent nearly a decade engineering a fake legal battle to recover a huge personal loan he made to his 2012 campaign—and kill another campaign finance law in the process. It’s about to succeed! https://t.co/UbvQ07pPsO @Slate
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) January 19, 2022
Sen. Ted Cruz ask Supreme Court to void anti-corruption campaign rule and with this Supreme Court it has a good chance of passing.https://t.co/6EVrBmawM2
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) January 19, 2022
The Supreme Court could decide if Ted Cruz gets $10,000. It matters more than you think https://t.co/s4xkuxZNby
— TIME (@TIME) January 19, 2022