Breitbart Radio Guest: The Left Always Says Love Is Love So Why Is It Creepy For Roy Moore To Date Teens?

“The left is the one — they’ve been saying ‘love is love’ for years, which means anything goes between — at least one hopes– consenting legal people. So that immediately means the Post larded up their story with allegations from people who were of legal age to undercut him to basically make it seem like the other case is more credible. Well, which is it?

“Is it ‘love is love,’ in which case you’re not going to go around reporting anything that crazy liberals do, you won’t show us how bad the gay pride parade is in San Francisco, etc? Or are you really going to say anybody who dates somebody who’s 16, even if it’s legal, they’re a creep?” – Media Research Center vice president Dan Gainor, speaking today on Breitbart’s SiriusXM channel.

RELATED: The MRC was founded by far-right extremist Brent Bozell, who is most famous for calling President Obama a “skinny ghetto crackhead” during a Christmas week 2011 appearance on Fox News.

  • crewman

    A 32 year old man assaulting a 14 year old girl is not love. It’s power. Pedophilia and sexual assault are both about asserting power over someone very vulnerable. Decent people on the left and right all advocate for consensual love. Children are not capable of understanding or making decisions about sexual interactions with adults, much less feel empowered to express dissent, especially when the adult seems prone to emphasize he’s a District Attorney. Imagine for a child how it is to have attention from such a powerful man — more powerful than her parents –simultaneously flattering, confusing, scary, and intimidating, and when it turns overtly sexual, horrifying and isolating.

    • Chucktech

      ‘Sides, yer just a young girl an ain’t nobody gownna buleev yew.

      • Ragnar Lothbrok

        Jesus don’t like kids who tattle. He might send your mommy to hell !

    • Adam Schmidt

      I just want to tell him, hey dumbass… only adults can provide consent. And if you don’t have active consent, it’s sexual assault. It’s pretty much that simple.

      • Maria

        Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
        On tuesday I got a great New Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !da64d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleNewNetJobsLineOpportunities/earn/hourly ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!da64luuu

    • j.martindale

      Terribly messed up people who have the power to irreparably damage the lives of children.

    • Buford

      I think most commenters here wildly misunderstood Gainor’s point. He was talking about Moore’s relationships with the girls who were 16 and older, not the 14-yo he molested. His point is that, since 16-yo is the age of consent in Alabama, we lefties are supposed to be accepting of anything that two consenting adults want to do, yet we are disgusted by Moore’s relationships with these girls.

      Again, this logic fails because not everything that’s legal is acceptable or appropriate per societal standards. If Moore does something that the majority of citizens find repugnant like dating 16-yo girls, that behavior won’t get him arrested BUT it will certainly prevent him from being elected.

      Also worth a mention – setting the age of consent at 16-yo is not necessarily problematic for 16 to 18-yo’s who want to enter relationships with one another. However, it wasn’t necessarily enacted to make 16-yo girls legally available to predatory men in their 30’s. Moore is a pig.

      • Stubenville
        • Buford

          That’s clearly not what I said. It IS what Gainor is suggesting, however… that because it’s legal, it’s hypocritical for the left to criticize behavior between two consenting adults. His logic presumes that anything not illegal is also automatically appropriate.

          • Stubenville

            [It was satire]

          • Buford

            (dammit)

          • Helen Damnation™

            (hehe)

      • J Ascher

        Age of consent legal adulthood.

        • Buford

          Agree. Had this discussion here previously. Is a 16-yo in Alabama who is old enough to consent still considered a minor… and, if so, what does that mean, legally…?

          • Helen Damnation™

            They, apparently, can get fucked but can’t vote, drink alcohol, or serve in the military. Turning 17, way back when, meant I started going to the gay bar! And ran up a huge tab till I turned 18… then I asked the barkeep if he had checked my ID lately…

          • Buford

            I distinctly remember when my buddy’s little sister turned 17, which meant that she could FINALLY legally dance in the topless joints in Texas. She couldn’t vote or drink, but she could strip!!

      • Gianni

        And did he get permission from the 16yr old girl’s mother? He said he always did that. You make a good point. Legality as to the minimum age of sexual consent doesn’t automatically confer social acceptability.

        • Buford

          Agree, and that’s the key point here. When it’s a Republican accused of wrongdoing, the threshold is immediately ‘legal or not’. If it’s legal, there’s no issue… as if anything not illegal is thereby immune from criticism…?

          But if it’s a non-Republican, the mere suggestion of impropriety is enough to warrant investigations, firings, resignations, impeachment, or imprisonment.

          • Helen Damnation™

            and lately, it’s gotten much, much worse.

          • Buford

            The word ‘tribalism’ keeps coming up. Eugene Robinson wrote about it in the WaPo today. They will vote party lines despite the repugnant, despicable actions of their party’s candidate and then justify it by pointing to the need for Republican-centric policies, court appointments, etc.

            Basically, achieving Republican goals in Washington is far more important to them than justice for victims of child molestation and sexual assault. Party over country. Tribalism.

          • wmforr

            Totally true. If there were a video of Roy Moor literally eating cow shit, they’d say, “It’s not illegal!”

          • Buford

            Yep… and the next day they’d chant “Lock her up!” despite Hillary being officially cleared of criminal wrongdoing in multiple investigations.

            “What he did isn’t illegal” vs. “Lock her up anyway!”

            That’s troubling.

      • Tatennant

        16 might be the age of consent but not adulthood. Nice try. Also little matter of he was married.

        • Buford

          ‘Nice try’? I’m not defending anyone here. I’m just pointing out that the vast majority of the commenters here misunderstood Gainor’s comments as conflating child molestation with ‘consenting adults’, and he didn’t say that. He’s saying… accurately… that it’s perfectly legal for Moore to date 16-yo girls.

          What Gainor misses is that just because it’s legal (and it is) doesn’t mean it’s appropriate or acceptable. It’s not, and voters will absolutely decide whether it’s sufficiently unacceptable to prevent him from being elected as Senator.

      • wmforr

        The age of consent in some countries is 12. Are they going to advocate for that now?

        • Buford

          Impossible.

  • safari

    He was a sexual predator and a creep. This isn’t “love is love”. This is a man who forced himself on teens.

  • Ham

    Aha! So that’s how the slippery slope works. On the right side of the slope.

  • TheManicMechanic

    These people will make any excuse to have things their way.

  • TrueWords

    So you (Dan) are admitting that Roy DID molest a 14 year old when he was 32…this is what I am hearing you say…

    • Buford

      Yes, but his point is that WaPo padded their story by adding the addtional transgression of ‘courting’ teen girls who were of legal age in Alabama (16)… so he’s saying that it was dishonest of WaPo to suggest wrongdoing where none existed in those cases.

      Again, the problem with that logic is that it presumes that anything not illegal is appropriate and acceptable, and that’s simply not true. A 32-yo dating 16-yo girls is legal, but it’s creepy and worthy of criticism and derision…. AND it’s a valid disqualifier for public office. Hell, Trump praising Angela Merkel’s boobs for the podium at some global summit would also be perfectly legal…

      • Christopher Smith

        And WaPo did NOT ‘suggest wrongdoing’–they merely stated additional facts. Since when is supporting evidence ‘padding?’

        • Buford

          I get his point… I just disagree with it. Listing all of Moore’s alleged wrongdoings, the list contains illegal acts such as molesting a 14-yo and sexually assaulting a 16-yo… but those crimes are listed alongside other legal-but-disgusting actions like cruising for 16-18-yo girls at the mall.

          Gainor emphasizes the distinction between the illegal and the simply disgusting… but the rest of us see it all, collectively, as the behavior of someone who has no business in a position of authority.

          • Christopher Smith

            Yep. I got your and his point….I simply find it not only logically indefensible hair-splitting but nauseating. Any intelligent adult is perfectly capable of distinguishing the *illegal* acts from the disgusting and morally bankrupt ones, and prior bad acts certainly go to proof not only of a disgusting pattern but of the propensity to do it over, and over, and over. Gainor and Moore have no defense, from any viewpoint.
            That is all.

          • Buford

            Try reducing your caffeine intake… you seem anxious and dickish. THAT is all.

          • Christopher Smith

            Try learning basic logic and rudimentary application of it….you seem stupid and bitchy.
            THAT IS ALL.

          • Buford

            HA ha.

          • Christopher Smith

            LMAO.

  • DisqusD37

    Says one creepy old white dude about another creepy old white dude.

  • unclemike

    CON. SENT. ING.

    Edit: AND. LE. GAL.

  • Ragnar Lothbrok

    Love IS love, stupid.

    Wrong IS wrong, and that is what you don’t get.

  • Starwind65

    14 yr old and consenting adult are two different things idiot. We want love, you want power over someone.

  • Ninja0980

    He is aware of consent, the thing 13 and 14 year old’s can’t give right?

  • pch1013

    He clearly spends a great deal of time thinking about sex with underage children.

  • Tomcat

    That guy should never have been given his 15 minutes.

  • JoeMyGod
    • Ninja0980

      What a snowflake!

    • Hank

      Gee, I cannot for the life of me, imagine why he would block you??? Could you tell us what you said to him, that got his “knickers in a twist”???

    • I blocked him for blocking you. We can all do without this nut job in our lives and clearly he is one of the festering spots on the backside of America.

    • HappyDance904

      “I generally block idiots. You got blocked long ago.” is his reply with @JoeMyGod:disqus

    • Guess

      Danny couldn’t handle the Love.

    • kaydenpat

      Badge of honor. He supports a creep.

  • Ragnar Lothbrok

    Not everyone who dates a 16 year old is a creep.

    Unless that creep is twice her age.

  • Mr. M

    Why am I not surprised Breitbart has someone on their radio program saying pedophilia is comparable to being gay?……

    • Todd20036

      Because the Nazis have been equating the two for as long as gay decided enough was enough

  • Henry Auvil

    God fucked Mary’s virgin teen pussyhole with eternal love and she spawned the macho guy Jesus. Wut’s yall’s problem?

  • Tomcat

    So to this guy pedophilia is the same as love, I see.

  • Chucktech

    Pedo love is pedo love.

  • AmeriCanadian

    Does he mention “NAMBLA”? Isn’t that a mandatory talking point?

  • Chucktech

    THE LEFT IS THE ONE!111!

    Yeah, that ol’ left sure is a meannie…

  • Blake J Butler
  • 14? Pedophilia? And they are condoning it? What is wrong with these people? I don’t care who does it– you can’t go after children like this — it can ruin the rest of their lives, especially when done so by someone in a postion of authority. I do not get it. Honestly, I do not get it. I have been unable to come to grips with this since the story broke — especially about the nerve of Moore to call a girl in high school and have her pulled out of Trigonometry class. My Mom, a retired educator summed it up best — he should have been chemically castrated the first time he laid his hands on someone that young– as an assistant DA. And he might become their Senator??????

    • Ragnar Lothbrok

      Surgically castrated.

    • Dagoril

      They don’t care about the wellbeing of women. And they don’t care about the wellbeing of children. They do care about fetuses though! But only until they’re born. And then fuck those moochers.

  • Treant

    I can’t. Even. If that isn’t obvious, there is no help for your lack of ethics.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/077a63e2fb8a7afdb8c43b9c8d9d29a921c155874a6976cd284a37dcc39b832f.gif

  • 2patricius2

    Do some of these critters realize what they are saying about themselves when they say these things?

    • marshlc

      I’m working on the assumption that they all have something to hide, and are desperate to stop the tide of victims telling their stories and being believed. Anything to muddy the waters, because if there start to be actual consequences for forcing your dick on people, well, straight male privilege is threatened, and we can’t have that!

  • Refugay

    Well they also say that Jesus loves you and will save you. So go ahead and do whatever the fuck you please because Jesus.

    • Treant

      That was “shave you.” They don’t like grass on the field.

  • Jmdintpa

    i like to think im non violent. however the things that i would like to do to a person like that are beyond scary to me.

    • Opinion Sousaphones

      Been there… lots and lots of times. It passes if you let it be just a thought.

  • Ninja0980

    O/T but Charlie Rose is a perv too.

  • OdieDenCO

    gainor is a special kind of ignorant

  • Jay George
    • Treant

      BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

      It’s incredibly funny-not funny. I appreciate the dichotomy.

      • Jay George

        I’m to the point if I don’t try and laugh about it, I’m afraid I’ll go into a psychotic rage.

        • Treant

          Been there, done that, made soap.

          Don’t ask what fat I made the soap from.

          • Galvestonian

            …is it scented soap ? I really like the hand made bay rum + lime that my hubby gets to sell at his barber shop.

      • Buford

        “Their little hands make me look HUGE!” – disgusting old joke

  • teedofftaxpayer

    Seriously?

  • Mike C

    Conservatives hate consent.

  • j.martindale

    GOP — Gang of Perverts

    • GanymedeRenard

      Group of Pigs works just as well.

    • J Ascher

      Groping Old Perverts

  • Mike

    That’s a good one, since it’s the right wing nutjobs who always say it’s a slippery slope, and if we let adults marry each other what’s next, adults lurking around playgrounds looking for someone to, you know, “love?”

  • JT

    Breitbart Radio Guest: The Left Always Says Love Is Love So Why Is It Creepy For Roy Moore To Date Teens?

    Lurch from Breitfart had to weigh in.

  • BobSF_94117

    Roy Moore certainly seems to have been “in love” with a lot of girls, one after the other.

  • Cackalaquiano

    It’s our fault y’all. You knew it would be.

  • shellback

    I’m reminded of: ‘Tis better to keep your mouth shut and have people think you a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
    [paraphrased from something or other]

    • -M-

      In this case you can substitute rapist for fool and it still applies.

  • FAEN

    Umm because a child, animal or inanimate object can’t consent dumb ass.

    Xtians and their fucked up views 🙄

    • Todd20036

      Neigh means neigh.

  • William

    16 will get you 20 in Texas.

    • Treant

      It will. But in PA, it gets you applause. The below has a handy map; much of the US is 16 or 17.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America

      • Lumpy Gaga

        Get to the point, pls!!!

        Anal intercourse in Canada

        Section 159 of the Criminal Code criminalizes anal intercourse, but provides exceptions for a husband and wife, and any two persons 18 years of age or older. These exceptions do not apply if a third person is present, or if the anal intercourse takes place anywhere but in private.[13] However, courts in Ontario,[14] Quebec,[15] and Alberta[16] have independently declared s. 159 to be unconstitutional as violations of the equality provision of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

        • Lars Littlefield

          Hmmmmm . . . so. even though we’re not into DPing, we’re still not safe with a third person (or more)? Bummer!*

          *That was a pun.

  • AtticusP

    “Consenting legal people“ only works when it is consented to by BOTH parties.

    These Moore apologists make me sick.

  • Jimmy R

    Key words: Consenting. Adults.

    These victims were neither. And yeah, “any [adult] who dates somebody who’s 16, even if it’s legal, they’re a creep?”

    Oh, and if you wanna find out just how “bad” the gay pride parade is, you can watch the whole thing on television.

  • Megrim Twist

    Where my consenting legal people at?

  • Boreal
  • Henry Auvil

    The left, the left, the left…. U mean la rive gauche, my favorite part of Paris? Mais OUI!

    • Hank

      Je suis d’accord avec toi!!! J’aime le 5ieme arrondissement!

  • Bad Tom

    “Love is love”.

    Yes, it is. When it is wanted by both parties.

    Right-wingers never get consent, do they? Never, ever.

  • Joe in PA

    Where is that pic of the old ladies:

    That’s not how any of this works!

  • Billanddogs

    Obviously, because Roy Moore’s advances were NOT love, they were child abuse.

  • forcebear

    TWO CONSENTING ADULTS
    YOU FUCKING MORON

  • Jack

    Is he crazy? Being of age is not the same as giving consent. I mean, damn, some people have even come to understand that marital rape is a real thing.

  • Jean-Marc in Canada

    Man, the contortions these idiots are trying to pull off are beginning to rival Chinese Acrobats.

  • Yixing’s Fluffer

    Nothing is quite so disturbing as witnessing the vast quantities of right-wingers who just don’t understand consent. They just don’t get it, and they assume it’s some kind of liberal conspiracy.

    • Cackalaquiano

      The same ones pushing to force women to use their bodies to carry unwanted pregnancies to term? They don’t get consent?
      We’re all surprised, right?

    • Gianni

      They aren’t that dense. It’s only a liberal conspiracy in defense of themselves. You know, when you haven’t a leg to stand on, blame someone else. It quickly shifts the view and the focus and, in the right-wing, there are more than enough dim bulbs to bite on that empty hook.

      • marshlc

        I think they really don’t understand it. Remember about a year ago, was it? one of them, I think Limbaugh, was all “Those liberals think that anything sexual is OK as long as there’s consent! Any weird thing is perfectly OK as long as everyone involved is consenting!” as if this is was craziness that just had to be stated to be understood to be totally insane. And all the liberals went “Um, yup, pretty much. What’s your point?”

        This is also why they are always spouting nonsense about marrying their keyboards or whatever. The notion that adults can enter into relationships that please them just Does Not Compute. It really gives insight into their own sexual lives, sadly.

  • Boreal

    Dan Gainor looks like a reanimated corpse.

  • M Jackson

    Could someone please translate that into English?

    • Bluto

      It’s the fag’s fault.

      • M Jackson

        Hey Bluto, did you give up on Olive Oyl?

        • Bluto

          Yeah, I switched to water based lube.

    • Gianni

      I agree. His speech is somewhat disjointed.

  • Clive Johnson

    He’s incapable of thinking.

    He doesn’t agree with his own thesis about liberals that “love is love” since he rejects SF Pride, and, presumably, same sex anything. But, he assumes for the sake of argument that if that standard is valid then, according to him, it also applies to Moore’s case. But since he in actuality rejects that standard–love is love–then he logically should reject it for Moore as well, but he adopts the conclusion that he could only adopt if he agreed with that standard. Hence, Moore is not guilty, but only because he accepts the standard that he rejects for liberals.

    Yes, he’s an idiot. They all are at breitbart.

    Next, he commits a non sequitur in arguing that consenting relations between adults should also apply to relations between adults and those not fully adult under the law, which begs the very question at issue–were these girls consenting to sexual contact with a much older man? Is consent possible in these cases?

    Finally, these 16+ year olds serve a very logical purpose–apparently lost on Gainor–which is that when you’ve proven that Moore had (has?) an ongoing interest in sex with teens and wasn’t concerned with verifying their ages, the claim that he would attempt molestation on a 14 year old isn’t the least bit surprising, and in fact is consistent and expected with his other behavior.

    There are no two sides here, two equally compelling arguments. There’s the evidence against Moore, which stands without refutation. And then there’s the confusion and idiocy and moral corruption of right-wingers.

  • GanymedeRenard

    Except the left does not defend pedophiles or unwanted sexual advances, sir.

  • EdA

    Not to date myself too much, but it’s mostly only in sappy movies and the novels they come from that “Love means never to have to say you’re sorry.”

    I know that it’s hard for Christianist fundamentalists, especially those living in the former slave states of the Confederacy, to understand, but for at least half a century in civilized society, love, or at least sex, implies MUTUAL valid consent.

  • It’s called “informed consent.”

    Adults are reasoned (in most cases) to be capable of giving it. Children are not. Hence why there are laws governing it.

  • shellback

    “…Why Is It Creepy For Roy Moore To Date Teens?”
    Let’s put your 14 year old daughter in the back seat with Roy and then ask her.

  • BearEyes

    consent still applies
    – unlike your false equivalencies.

  • EdA

    It’s interesting that so much Southern Baptist ministers, and other Christianist fundamentalists, would apparently approve of NAMBLA — except presumably for the gay thing. Incidentally, the monthly FFRF (Freedom From Religion Foundation) newsletter has a list of “men (and women) of God” arrested for attempting to intercourse with kids too young to drive..

    • Ben in Oakland

      I’ve got a list and I’m checking it twice…

  • j.martindale

    I am a bit straight laced. I have always thought some of the goings on at Mardi Gras and Gay Pride and some of the other raucous events were in questionable taste. But they are basically harmless. They are adults behaving “naughty.” And that is their business. I wouldn’t take my child to some of those events. But like television that is vulgar, I just turn away.

    Can’t believe the false equivalency crowd would ever compare that to pedophilia.

  • MT YVR

    Look at me being surprised that the idea of consent and what that means in any situation completely flew over this guy’s head.

    Among other things.

    Seriously. This is the defence of “look, I’m about to prove I don’t have the slightest connection with humanity in any sense, isn’t it funny when I do this to dehumanize a large group of people?”

  • 1) One of them was 14, not 16.
    2) The left talks about CONSENTING ADULTS, recognizing that children cannot legally consent. If you can’t sign a legally binding contract, you can’t consent.
    3) If you can’t see the difference, you’re a shitty excuse for a human being.

  • Kelly Lape

    So let me get this “straight” – This asshole is advocating for MANBLA?

  • Buford

    I’ll state the obvious… the basis of his argument is that, for Republicans, no behavior is a disqualifier unless it resulted in a criminal conviction. If it wasn’t criminal, or if their guy was not convicted for it, it’s perfectly fine!!!

    – So a 32-yo dating 16-yo girls? Not against the law! It’s fine!

    – Hillary is cleared of wrongdoing despite 3 yrs of investigations? “Lock her up!!”

    – Trump fired Comey to take the pressure off the Russia investigation? No law against that.

    – Bill Clinton got a blowjob in the Oval Office? Impeach him!!

    Funny how that works.

  • iambu

    Are you guys like, allergic to the concept of consent?

    • TexasBoy

      Well, to them, all females of any age are just property, like in the Bible. Consent isn’t in the Bible.

  • FelineMama

    “Love is Love”?? LOVE???!! Rape & molestation do not= Love. Damn, these pricks are Stupid.

  • bkmn

    They really have a hard time grasping the concept of informed consent.

    • Stogiebear

      If only they had as much trouble grasping underage kids.

    • ByronK

      I marvel that they’re able to grasp the concept of things like doors and shoelaces.

    • Jerry Kott

      Except if they have a note from their Mother? Moore had claimed that when he dated an underage girl, he would ask for permission from their mother? When reality comes knocking on their door, they always muddy the water.

      • -M-

        He can claim that about the ones who were minors but above the age of consent. It doesn’t apply and isn’t true of either the 14 y/o or the teen waitress he tried to rape.

        • Jerry Kott

          i agree. He is looking for any wiggle room while he is the center of this news spin/cycle.

  • penpal

    He brings up an interesting point because I always said that about the right: they were desperate to piggyback their sexual perversions onto our fight for equal marriage access rights. How many religious right types were screaming about marrying their daughters or their cousins, or marrying their farm animals, and how by allowing two consenting adults access to marriage, this was all going to happen? From my perspective, it’s what they want. The only thing stopping them from delving headfirst into their sick fantasies are legal boundaries. And as we’ve seen over the past month with Moore, they’re crumbling already. But hey, religion and child fucking go hand in hand. They always have.

    • Dazzer

      That’s an excellent point. I hadn’t looked at it that way.

      Thanks for encapsulating something that had been annoying me at the fringes of this whole debate and hadn’t been able to put my finger on it.

      Thank you.

  • -M-

    Deflection.

    The question is, did Roy Moore take a fourteen year old to his house and feel her up? Did Roy Moore attempt to rape a teenage waitress? Did Roy Moore ply minors with alcohol? Did Roy Moore frequently harass women and/or girls while they were working or hanging out with their friends?

    • ByronK

      Oh, details, details! Those things don’t matter when you’re a Republican. Just the tip or the whole thing? Who cares?!!

  • Javier Smith

    When the religious zealots said gay marriage would lead to pedophilia I didn’t realize they were talking about themselves…

    • Ben in Oakland

      I did. Projection is what the DO.

  • Stubenville

    Fourteen, you monster. It isn’t legal, it isn’t ethical.

  • ByronK

    How bad the San Francisco Pride parade is? Gee, I don’t remember any coverage of all the tiki torches and Nazi flags…

  • Pip

    Again with the instant mind on pedo. These people are sick in the head.

  • Cucker “Dick” Tarlson

    Because fuck you, Dan.

  • Stubenville

    And the latest perv is Charlie Rose, according to the 6 PM news.

  • ClevelandJim

    Gosh, he left out the whole NON-CONSENSUAL aspect of the Roy Moore case…oopsie.

  • Tom Furgas

    Mr. Gainor, it’s creepy because you can suck my dick.

  • Gianni

    He’s speaking to that particular audience who don’t want to think about words, their meanings, nuances in speech, etc. He well knows that those people will never examine the inconsistencies and contradictions in what he’s saying. It’s like he’s trying to stitch together pieces same-color cloth, make it invisible, but he’s using different colored threads. In that respect, they’re all colorblind.

  • Skeptical_Inquirer

    Seriously, the GOP ideal of sex is something akin to wasps planting their eggs inside unfortunate spiders or caterpillars and the eggs hatch and eat their way out of the hosts. Because it sure as hell doesn’t involve, fun, consent, or pleasure.

  • dcurlee

    Fucking idiots

  • houstonray
  • Wynter Marie Starr

    Buy a fucking dictionary and look up the word consensual and the term of age. You can’t be this seriously stupid, can you?

    Love is love doesn’t mean anything goes and you damn well fucking know it. If you don’t, then you are an incredibly stupid and ignorant person

  • Phaius

    “between — at least one hopes– consenting legal people.”

    SHE WASN’T CONSENTING, YOU STUPID MOTHER FUCKER.

  • Guess

    Loathe is loathe.

  • Barry William Teske

    Breitbart*.
    Because dividing a great nation is as easy as right vs. left.

    *Fascism 101

  • Galvestonian

    ’cause it’s just as illegal for a man over 30 ( or indeed over his majority ) to date a boy or male child of any age under the age of legal consent. …so Fuck You very much.

  • Kruhn

    Hey moron! It’s called consent. In Moore’s case those encounters were not consensual as he forced himself on his victims.

  • J Ascher

    That this guy, and people like him, can’t tell the difference between consensual adult relations and predatory behavior tells you all you need to know about their “morals!”

  • kaydenpat

    Another idiot who can’t tell the difference between consensual relationships and child molestation. Wonder what’s in his closet.

    • Alex Polkovsky

      Additionally, he can’t tell the difference between age of consent versus concentual sex. It would blow his tiny little mind to consider that women have the power to give or deny consent. Or that abuse of power, manipulation, and emotional pressure exerted in order to get sex from a minor is criminal.

  • KarenAtFOH

    Fuck these GOP, conservative, tea party, religious assholes. Assault and love are two different things.

  • Steverino

    Yep. Here we go: HowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhataboutAlFranken?AndhowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhataboutBillClinton?Andhowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhataboutfreelove?Andhowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhatabouthowaboutwhatabout………………..

  • Ann Kah

    Because minors. And because stalking. And because an important official targeted vulnerable girls, with the threat of “I’m important. Nobody will believe you.” Creepy, creepy, and creepy.

  • RainbowPhoenix

    Anytime someone makes a comparison between consensual same-sex relationships and statutory rape, they should immediately be investigated for sexual or domestic offenses, since they obviously don’t understand the legal doctrine of informed consent.

  • Alexander Stallwitz

    Oh Jebus, where do i start with what is wrong with this? For starters this is a textbook example of the Slippery Slope fallacy.

  • wmforr

    Look for the Christian to found NAMGLA soon.

  • JCF
  • craigbear

    Love BETWEEN CONSENTING ADULTS, you dried lump of bat guano.

  • Terry

    I pray this idiot hasn’t sired offspring yet…